In Spain, the line separating an irregular contract from a crime of fraud by simulated contract is thin, but crucial. Many people face unjustified accusations due to erroneous or malicious interpretations of their contractual agreements. If you have been reported for this cause, understanding the elements of article 251.3 of the Criminal Code and defense strategies can make the difference between a conviction and an acquittal.
Throughout this article, we will explore in depth the crime of simulated contract and fraud, addressing its legal regulation, the keys to its identification and the most effective strategies for a solid criminal defense.
What is a simulated contract?
A simulated contract is one in which the parties, consciously and deliberately, issue a declaration of will with the purpose of generating the appearance of a contract that, in reality, does not exist or differs from the agreement actually reached. This legal figure is configured as a defect of consent, since the parties, by mutual agreement, manifest a fictitious will, that is, they externalize content that does not reflect their true intention.
Contractual simulation can take various forms:
- Illicit simulation: Occurs when the fictitious contract has the purpose of harming third parties, defrauding their rights or interests.
- Absolute simulation: Occurs when the parties appear to enter into a contract, but in reality have no intention of p
Looking for a criminal defense attorney?
Difference between simulated contract and other criminal offenses
It is common for reports of simulated contract to be confused with other economic crimes. Knowing these differences can help you dismantle unfounded accusations.
Difference between simulated contract and document falsification
In document falsification (art. 390 CP), what is punished is the manipulation of a document to make it appear authentic.
In the simulated contract, the document is formally valid, but the content reflects a false or incomplete legal reality.
The Supreme Court distinguishes the simulated contract from document falsification, stating that the mere signing of a contract with false content does not imply document falsification if the document itself is authentic. In this case, conviction was for improper fraud, since the contractual simulation generated economic harm.
It is not the same to create a contract with false content (simulated contract) as to falsify a document (document falsification). The key is whether the document is genuine but deceptive or directly false.
Difference between simulated contract and concealment of assets
If the simulation is used to hide assets and avoid payments, it may constitute concealment of assets (art. 257 CP).
If the objective is not to evade debts, but to simulate a
Do you need a lawyer specializing in fraud cases?
How can a criminal defense attorney expert in economic crimes help you?
If you have been reported for simulated contract and fraud, having a criminal defense attorney specialized in economic crimes can make the difference between an acquittal and a conviction. In these cases, the defense must be built on a solid legal foundation that allows demonstrating the lack of fraudulent intent, the absence of real economic harm or the civil nature of the conflict.
An attorney expert in economic crimes will analyze your case in detail and design a defense strategy adapted to your situation. Some of the most effective lines of defense include:
Demonstrating the existence of a legal business
If the contract was not a simple simulation, but there existed a legitimate agreement between the parties, it is fundamental to demonstrate it with
- Documentation that supports the transaction (invoices, transfers, emails).
- Testimonies from people who can attest to the veracity of the agreement.
- Evidence that the contract had a legal and non-fraudulent purpose.
Proving the absence of economic harm
For there to be improper fraud by simulated contract, the simulation must have caused patrimonial damage to a third party. A criminal defense attorney can demonstrate that:
- The complainant did not suffer real economic losses.
- Se
Do you need an attorney expert in fraud?
Abogado penalista en Madrid (Graduado en Derecho y ADE con Máster de Acceso a la Abogacía), experto en procedimientos complejos y técnicos en Derecho Penal. Cuenta con títulos como el Curso de DerechoPenal Avanzado impartido por magistrados del Tribunal Supremo en el Iltre. Colegio de Abogacía de Madrid.
